BACKTRACKING
Bagdad and the American Civil War
by
Terry Hogan
It
has been a while since I have done a genealogy article on Òlessons learnedÓ.
This is one. It demonstrates, once
again, that the assumptions you make unknowingly are the ones that get you into
trouble. This article is about my continuing effort to Òput meat on the bonesÓ
of the story of my great grandfather Jasper Newton Hogan, and one of those
assumptions that had led me astray into unproductive research.
Jasper
was only 18 years old when he joined the Company H of the 91st
Illinois Infantry in Green County, Illinois. Two other companies of the 91st were recruited in
Henderson County and the Regiment had Lt. Colonel Harry S. Smith of Knox County
until he resigned on October 20, 1864. I have JasperÕs Civil War military records
from the National Archives. I have
his 91st Adjutant GeneralÕs (AG) published unit history. I have miscellaneous documents relating
to various battles that Jasper and his unit fought between 1862 and the end of
the Civil War in 1865. Jasper is buried in Galesburg with a Civil War monument.
But
I was really interested in a brief mention of a battle that Jasper was involved
with along the Rio Grande in Texas.
The Rio Grande was strategically important during the war, but little is
noted about the area in Civil War histories. As the Rio Grande was the border between the U.S. and
Mexico, it was an international river and thus could not be blockaded by the
North as the Southern ports were.
The North needed to block the shipment of the SouthÕs cotton through
Texas, across the Rio Grande to Mexico and then down the Rio Grande. The cotton
was listed as Mexican goods and was transported to awaiting foreign ships to
carry the cotton to England and France.
These countries badly needed the cotton to support their domestic cotton
mill industry. The South needed
the foreign currency to buy guns, ammunition and other war materials that it
could not produce domestically.
On
November 3, 1863, the 91st Illinois Infantry became part of the
NorthÕs efforts to block the shipment of cotton across the Rio Grande. On that
date, it arrived at Point Isabell, Texas, via the Mississippi River and the
Gulf of Mexico. On November 6, the unit began moving across land from Point
Isabell to Fort Brown at Brownsville, Texas on November 9. In the unitÕs published Adjutant
GeneralÕs Report, a brief mention is made of the report of French troops
crossing the Rio Grande to support Confederate troops in battle with the 91st. The battle occurred near Bagdad on
September 11, 1864. The report
records:
ÒÉuntil
the 11th day of September, 1864, when the Regiment had quite a fight
with the rebels near Bagdad, on north side of Rio Grande River, and it was said
at the time a squadron of French troops forded the Rio Grande to help the
rebels, but all to no use, for they were driven back and over the old battle
field of ÒPalo AltoÓ of 1846.
Rebel loss, 20 killed and left on the field. Our loss, two wounded.Ó
I
have spent much time and effort searching for information about this battle
near Bagdad and any information about French troop involvement. During the Civil War, the French set up
the Austrian, Maximilian, as ruler over Mexico. The Mexicans and the Americans were not pleased with the
French presence. Searches about the battle and for Bagdad, Texas did not prove
very productive. References
indicated that Bagdad no longer existed, but that its former site was near
Leander, Texas. It neither made
mention of the 91st Illinois Infantry nor of the presence of French troops.
My
Unknown Assumption:
I
assumed that Bagdad was in Texas.
It was made without real thought.
The 91st was in Texas; the battle was in Texas. It seemed to
be a Òno brainerÓ. But it was an
incorrect assumption. Bagdad was not in Texas. It was located across the Rio
Grande in Mexico. With this discovery, via a $1 clearance book on the history
of Texas and Texans, this information became available to me.
Bagdad
was located across the Rio Grande from Clarksville, Texas. Cotton from East Texas and other parts
of the South was transported to the Rio Grande to Bagdad. At Bagdad, the cotton was loaded on to
shallow draft boats that carried the cotton to the mouth of the Rio Grande,
choked with sand bars and shallow waters, where the cotton bales were loaded on
to waiting ships in the Gulf of Mexico.
It has been reported that as many as 300 foreign ships were anchored
waiting for the SouthÕs cash crop – cotton.
As
the New York Herald wrote in May
of 1863 in a large front page article, complete with a map of Texas, it was
crucial for the North to stop the cotton trade to dry up the SouthÕs ability to
buy war goods.
But
the story, like most Civil War stories, is more complex than this. Neither the North nor the South wanted
France in Mexico. Mexico didnÕt
want French troops in Mexico.
There was even a trial balloon floated to create a cease fire between
the North and the South so that they could join forces and fight the French in
Mexico. Advocates of this plan
hoped it would bind the American wounds by fighting a common enemy and bring an
end to the American bloodletting. Obviously, this did not happen and the loss
of life continued for a couple more years. In fact, the Rio Grande saw a battle between the North and
the South occur over a month after Lee surrendered to Grant.
Gotta
a Map?
So,
you might wonder why I didnÕt just look on a map of Texas and/or Mexico and see
Bagdad Mexico along the Rio Grande.
I did look at maps but there was no Bagdad Mexico. Bagdad was destroyed by a hurricane in
1867. Even the nearby town of
Clarksville, Texas no longer exists.
Its few remains were buried under sand when the Rio Grande shifted its
channel. The effective
disappearance of Bagdad maybe can be better appreciated by the fact that at its
peak of the cotton shipping business, Bagdad had changed from a sleepy little
fishing village of wood and mud huts to a town of approximately 15,000
folks. The inhabitants spoke many
different languages but shared two things in common – a desire to make lots
of money off the war, and participation in political, military, and economic
intrigue.
One
could almost see a Òdivine interventionÓ in the eradication of Bagdad shortly
after the end of the Civil War.
The
French?
So
now I have lots of information about why my great grandfather, Jasper, was in
Texas, fighting Confederates in late 1863 and 1864. I know from published descriptions of the battles and the
local environs, what his life was like in 1863. Nevertheless, I find nothing to
support the brief reference of French troops crossing over into the United
States to fight with the South against the North. It must not have occurred, as it is unlikely that historians
would have ignored a battle between Union and French troops.
The
Moral
If
you have hit the Òbrick wallÓ in genealogical research, take a step back and
carefully look for the unknown assumption that may have led you astray. (Just
because ÒBagdadÓ doesnÕt sound Mexican, it doesnÕt mean it wasnÕt in Mexico).