BACKTRACKING
Backtracking the
Y-Chromosome
by Terry Hogan
In the March 1, 2007
issue of The Zephyr, I had an article appear that was titled Genetic
Genealogy. The short version of that article was
that I had sent a sample of my DNA for the Y-chromosome to be analyzed at 37
loci. These data would then be compared with other Y-chromosome data provided
by other genealogists, to find out who I was closely related to, based on the
tests results of the Y-chromosome.
Why the
Y-Chromosome? To answer, I need to
explain a little genetics that you may remember from school days. Women are women because they have two
X-chromosomes. Men are men because
they have an X-chromosome and a Y-chromosome. Because there are two X-chromosomes in women, the
chromosomes can "trade" a little genetic material between the two
chromosomes. This exchange of
genetic information between the two X's is called
"translocation". It
helps create a little greater genetic diversity by stirring the pot. In evolution, that is probably good. For tracking ancestors, that is bad.
Males have only the one
X and the one Y chromosome and thus cannot trade genetic material between the
two chromosomes. So the genetic
material stays pretty much the same on the Y-chromosome, except for mutations. As there is only one Y-chromosome and
that is what makes an offspring a make, fathers pass on the Y-chromosome from
father to son, generation after generation, with little variability.
This consistent
Y-chromosome thus becomes a "traceable" characteristic from son to
father, to grandfather, etc. So, males can have their Y-chromosome analyzed and
compared with others to determine likely shared common ancestors. The closer
the match of the data from the Y-chromosome, the higher the statistically
probability that the two males are related. Similarly, the closer the match, the more likely that the
two shared a common ancestor recently.
Alas, females cannot do
this testing as they lack a Y-chromosome. So females must impose on a male
blood relative such as a father or uncle to give up a little DNA. Of course there are also some
risks. Unknown adoptions or family
infidelity might show up, particularly if two male members of a family each
submit DNA independently. Two
brothers should have a very high probability of a perfect match. If not, it could be a lab error or the
start of a new family history.
But so much for the
background and "genetics 101".
If Dr. Billy Gear, who taught me several genetic courses while I
attended Knox College many years ago, reads this article, I hope he will Òcut
me some slackÓ. What we are doing
now wasn't even vaguely a Ògleam in anybody's eyeÓ in the mid-1960Õs.
Anyway, I got my
Y-chromosome data back from "Family Tree DNA", an organization
that does this type of work and is the lab of choice for the Hogan DNA project
on the Internet. My Y-chromosome
matched 36 out of 37 loci for the family group of HoganÕs that I believe were
"mine" based on about 20 years of circumstantial data
collection. According to the going
rate, a match of 36 out of 37 would get you about a 90% probability that the
most recent common relative would have occurred within 8 generations. If it had been a 37 of 37 (perfect
match), it would have given about a 90% probability in 5 generations.
The test results for my
Y-chromosome are compared with chromosome data from family group members whose
lineage is proven beyond reasonable doubt. When mine matches with a high degree, it doesn't tell me
"who" the common ancestor is or "how" the relationship tracked
down to me. It just says, on a
probability basis, that it is very likely that a family relationship is
present. But it was my traditional
genealogical researches that led me to believe I could predict the association
that in fact was shown.
And no, the lab did not
know who I thought I was related to. The lab doesn't care. It makes money off the test and running
a computer for the data comparison.
So, the test can be thought of as one more very strong, but still
circumstantial piece of evidence.
But it is good enough for me.
As such, I'm pretty
satisfied that my known great grandfather, Jasper Newton Hogan, was indeed the
son of Banister W. Hogan, who was born in Montgomery County, North
Carolina. Both fought in the Civil
War. Jasper fought with the 91st
Illinois Infantry from 1862 through the end of the war in 1865. Banister joined a North Carolina unit
and died in a hospital in North Carolina less than a year later. It was another case of father against
son in the American Civil War.
If you might be interested in the
genetic research, a good place to start is the Internet. Do a "Goggle" or similar
search with your surname of interest and add "DNA" with the search. See if you can find someone who is
already hosting a surname database.
Getting DNA test results with nobody to compare with won't help you
much.
If you are interested in
seeing the Hogan DNA project, you can go to www.worldfamilies.net/surnames/h/hogan/results.html. I'm guessing you could drop the
"h/hogan/" and insert the appropriate initial and surname of interest
to see if you might find something of more specific interest to you. It might be worth a try.
Y-chromosome?
Y-not.
3-14-07