The
chair was pulled out from under Cohen
by
Mike Kroll
The
Citizen's Utility Board, better known as CUB, was founded 21 years ago by the
Illinois legislature to represent the interests of consumers in matters
regarding utility rates and policies. For the last 12 of those years Martin
Cohen has been executive director and the very public face of the consumer
advocacy group, until he was appointed as chair of the Illinois Commerce
Commission by Governor Rod Blagojevich. The ICC is responsible for overseeing
the operation and rates of private utilities in Illinois and the governor's
appointments must be confirmed by the State Senate. The process is so
mechanical that no governor's appointment had been denied confirmation since
the 1970s-- until last week.
In
what at first glance appeared to be a close vote the Illinois Senate failed to
confirm Cohen who need 30 votes but received only 28; but senate insiders noted
that the carefully orchestrated vote was designed to permit senators facing
reelection to make a Òpro-consumerÓ vote while still guaranteeing that Cohen
not be confirmed. While nine Democrats voted ÒpresentÓ all eleven Democrats and
eleven Republicans up for reelection next year were free to vote ÒyesÓ without
fear because those ÒpresentÓ votes were counted as veiled ÒnoÓ votes. A
bi-partisan group of senators led by president Emil Jones (D) and Republican
Senate Leader Frank Watson claimed that Cohen would be too biased against the
utility companies to be an impartial arbiter on the commission. That was the
only complaint voiced against Cohen. What is well documented is that Jones and
Watson, like numerous other senators, have been recipients of substantial
contributions from utility interests (for example, well over one-half million
dollars just between Jones and Watson since January 1 2003) who certainly
didn't want their longtime foe heading the ICC.
Nobody
questioned Cohen's credentials for the chairmanship of the five-member
commission nor have past ICC appointments been turned away due to their coziness
with the utility industry itself. In fact Cohen was the first ever ICC
appointment to not be confirmed by the state senate. There is no question that
Cohen's appointment Òrepresented a great victory for consumersÓ as noted by CUB
president Randy Fritz, Òbut then the purpose of the ICC was to look out for the
public interest in utility matters so that can hardly be seen as a conflict of
interest to anyone but the utilities themselves. I know Marty very well and I
do believe he was very fair and he has an indisputably depth of understanding
of the issues. He would have bent over backwards to be fair but he certainly
wasn't going to simply roll over for the utilities.Ó
Fritz
is a teacher in Williamsfield, a Knox County resident and one of 14 current members
of the CUB board elected by Illinois congressional district (several areas have
no current board representation) to lead the non-profit, non-partisan group
that represents consumers before the ICC at rate and regulatory hearings.
ÒSince our founding it is estimated that we have saved Illinois utility
customers over $10 billion by
blocking rate hikes and promoting regulatory reform. Perhaps one of the lessons
of this experience is that CUB was too identified with one person, Marty Cohen,
and that worked against both of us. Marty will land on his feet and CUB will
continue to effectively fight the utility companies. Our record speaks for
itself-- we have been able to do stuff that an organization like CUB shouldn't
have been able to accomplish.
With
his poll numbers low and falling there has been speculation that Blagojevich
may have simply used Cohen as a sacrificial pawn. After all he has a long close
history with utility interest money himself and he did very little to promote
or assist Cohen's confirmation. On the other hand utilities Commonwealth Edison
and Ameren made no secret of their displeasure in the Cohen appointment as they
prepare for ICC hearings on proposals that could lead to substantial increases
in electrical rates-- perhaps as much as 37 percent. According to David Kolata,
who replaced Cohen as executive director of CUB, ÒComEdÕs rate hike proposal
would give a whole new meaning to the words Ôelectric shock' after the company
used its political muscle to try to keep a consumer advocate off the ICC at
precisely the time when we need one the most – largely because ComEd is
trying to mistreat consumers.Ó Kolata isn't among those who blame Blagojevich
for Cohen's plight, ÒThe Governor and his people did all they could to get
Martin confirmed and [the governor] has pledged to appoint yet another
consumer-friendly person to chair the ICC.Ó
Kolata
points out that the Illinois electrical generating power market is heavily
concentrated in only three companies, Exelon (parent of Commonwealth Edison),
Midwest Generation and Ameren (parent of Illinois Power and CILCO), and as the
deregulated portion of the industry these companies are in position to force
substantial rate increases through their regulated electrical delivery sister
companies merely by charging more for the generated power sold via Òauction.Ó
In the view of Kolata this is a thinly disguised means to circumvent the entire
regulatory process. The competition that was predicted following the 1997
deregulation of electrical power generation never materialized and in fact has
actually diminished following a spate of mergers and acquisitions of Illinois
utilities. Meanwhile the parent companies of these utilities experienced record
profits during this period.
CUB
has always been strong in this area and both Fritz and Kolata are committed to
building the group further. ÒOne of my priorities will be to do more community
outreach and work hard to recruit additional CUB members,Ó said Kolata. ÒWe
have withstood the pressure from extremely well-financed utility interests for
over two decades,Ó said Fritz, Òwe will continue to honor our commitment to
Illinois consumers at a time when the actions of the utility companies cannot
help but swell our member ranks.Ó
Two
things are abundantly clear from this chapter. First is that only the naive can
continue to claim that the supposedly non-political state regulatory agencies
actually operate that way. Otherwise the charge that anyone on the ICC was too
pro-consumer would be seen as the absurdity that it is given the agency's
mission. Second is that regardless of the posturing it remains painfully clear
that Illinois' porous campaign financing rules are an invitation to special
interests to buy friendly legislation regardless of how politically unpopular
it might be. Try to find any voter who doesn't favor tight reigns on utility
rates, it can't be done-- yet this episode proves well that a well financed
special interest campaign trumps the politically popular. As presently
constituted the ICC doesn't even present a speed bump to the efforts by the
utility companies to escape regulation of rates or performance and they damn
well want to keep it that way.
11/17/05