What in the WORLD
is going on?
By Peter
Schwartzman
January 29, 2009
There is a
lot happening on environmental fronts here in the United States. On the hopeful
side, President Obama seems determined to subsidize renewable energy
development and green jobs, thus, marking a major shift in U.S. policy. On the
less welcome side, we’ve had a few crises recently. Three days before
Christmas, the largest coal ash spill in our history occurred when over a
billion gallons of this toxic end product of coal burning spread over a rural
Tennessee county (so much for “clean” coal); by comparison, the Exxon Valdez
spilled only one-tenth this amount of crude oil into Alaskan waters in 1989. On
Christmas Day, an oil pipeline owned by ConocoPhillips burst causing ~95,000
gallons of crude to be released into the environment. To top it all off, we
have the major salmonella outbreak in many processed peanut butter products
resulting in one of the largest recalls ever (over 31 million pounds so far).
These are important issues. All have significant implications for the future of
our energy and food systems. Yet, while it is very important to keep up with
domestic environmental happenings, it is equally important to keep abreast of
events transpiring elsewhere.
The minute
we leave the United States, the world becomes a foreign place to many of us.
Partly this is by design. Our educational system spends much too little time on
geography and international relations. Partly, it is a byproduct of never
having been outside the U.S. before. Of those that have been to distant places,
most probably spent their time doing touristy things. While one can learn a lot
on such excursions, typically they shelter visitors from many things, making it
difficult for them to understand the challenges faced by nations and people
abroad. Another reason we are relatively ignorant about goings-on elsewhere is
the enormous size of the Earth. Even those that have been deeply engaged with
another part of the world, perhaps through missionary work or the Peace Corps,
have only been exposed to one sector of this vast planet. For all these
reasons, it is imperative that we make an extra effort not only to expose
ourselves to things happening far away but to understand our connection to any
underlying problems.
When one
finally looks out at the world and its nearly 200 countries, one begins to get
a glimpse of how much is going on. While it is impossible here to cover the
entire planet, there are a couple happenings that will highlight both the connection
these situations have with us as well as the urgent need for more awareness and
engagement with what otherwise might be considered foreign affairs. Before
elaborating, let’s speculate on what types of problems might exist. Consider
our lives. What is characteristic of them, in contrast to the lives of other
people on the globe? One of the more telling differences between us and others
is that we hoard/consume resources voraciously. Such consumption might be
beneficial to others or it might be detrimental, but, either way, we should
expect it to have a considerable impact. We only need to look at some of the
more obvious resources feeding our consumerism to learn a few important
lessons.
Oil is
something we use in abundance. Our vehicles are filled with it, our farm
implements run on it, and even our clothes and furniture is made with it (i.e.,
plastics and fibers derived from petroleum). Among countries with at least five
million people, the U.S. trails behind only Canada for the honor of highest oil
consuming nation (on a per person basis). In gross terms, the U.S. leads the
pack by far; we use more than 20 million barrels of oil a day (a barrel is 42
gallons); the next closest country in the world is China (at 6.4 million) and
Japan (at 5.6 million). Where we find oil being extracted, not surprisingly, we
find repercussions.
Though not
one of the top importers of petroleum to the U.S., Ecuador, still sends around
80 million barrels (annually) this way. Oil has been coming out of this
equatorial nation for quite some time. Its extraction, however, may not have
been conscientious of the indigenous inhabitants or the environment. At least
this is what is being alleged in one of the most important legal battles taking
place in the environmental arena right now. Plaintiffs from rural northeastern
Ecuador are suing U.S. oil giant Chevron for toxic dumping they claim was done
in their region by the oil giant Texaco (who merged with Chevron in 2001) over
a nearly thirty year period starting in the mid-1960’s. This lawsuit, known as Aguinda
v. ChevronTexaco, which began
litigation over fifteen years ago and consists of forty-eight inhabitants of
the Oriente region suing on behalf of 30,000 other residents, has the potential
to be a historic case. The oil waste byproducts dumped into thousands of open
pits have dispersed into surrounding areas and left soils poisonous, drinking
water toxic, and the fish highly contaminated, contend the plaintiffs. The
stakes are high not only because the actions of a multi-national corporation
are under critical examination here but the damage and destruction associated
with the lingering pollution is so grand—for instance, cancer rates are very
high among people living near the pits.
If
the plaintiffs win the case, it could lay the groundwork for additional cases
regarding other key contaminated zones throughout the world. Yet, independent
of what the courts eventually settle, two observations are glaring. First, if
in fact a company is responsible for this major toxic release, how long does it
take for them have to pay for their reckless disregard for life, assuming they
will be forced to pay something? (And does paying a fine solve the problem or
recompense the victims?) Second, are those who used this oil (to commute or
dress up) somehow complicit in these tragic episodes? If so, what price should
they pay? And if not, why not? (For those that remain skeptical about the
likelihood that a multinational corporation would disregard environmental laws
and not respect the dignity and health of indigenous people, I urge you to investigate
this case more closely as well as a similar case which was settled out of court
in 2004 which involved the alleged crimes committed by another oil giant Unocal
in association with the building of a pipeline in the Asian country of Burma.)
Our
use of petroleum has indirectly spawned other problems as well. We’ve been
using gasoline for a long time—ever since the oil-powered military ships of
World War I helped combustion engines displace electric cars early in the 20th
Century. But coincident with this shift, a very dangerous material became
synonymous with gasoline from the 1920’s on: Lead (well, actually, tetraethyl
lead, a lab produced variety that corporations could patent—making it an
incredibly lucrative—and exclusive—additive to automotive gasoline.) For over
sixty years, we pumped leaded gasoline into our cars despite the recognition by
many scientists that it was highly toxic and detrimental to neurological
function and mental development, especially in children. We also added lead to
paint until the late 1970’s. Though now banned in the United States for use in
gasoline and paint, the lead industry is still doing quite well. Apparently new
markets for lead had to be found (similar to how U.S. cigarette companies broadened
international efforts after laws and cultural shifts in U.S. reduced the pool
of potential smokers).
The
biggest lead smelter in the United States is located in Herculaneum, Missouri
(~30 miles south of St. Louis). After more than a decade on the Environmental
Protection Agency’s probation list for violations of emissions, Doe Run, the
company that runs the plant, felt compelled (by increased media and public
pressure) to purchase over a hundred homes and remove contaminated soil from
several hundred neighboring yards. This not-so-well-known company operates many
factories around the world and its affiliate company, Doe Run Peru, operates
one of the most notorious metal smelting plants in the world. Located in La
Oroya, Peru, high in the Andes, one cannot imagine how polluted this community
is and how devastated the area has become. Once a valley surrounded by green
pastures, now the people are sick, the animals are dying, the river is devoid
of fish, and the land is highly contaminated with poisons. The local people,
who number about 30,000 (roughly the same population as Galesburg), are poor
and have few options. Must they sacrifice their bodies, their minds, and their
communities, for the right to live? Are there any lawsuits pending in this
situation? None that I am aware of. And as long as these plants can operate
with minimal human and environmental concern, and as long as we keep buying
copper and lead (which is still allowed in the U.S. for propeller planes and
NASCAR race cars!), we can be sure that the children and families of La Oroya
will continue to suffer mercilessly. Herculaneum’s example teaches us that even
the U.S. EPA can drag its feet for years before doing something about major
lead contamination. The La Oroya situation indicates how despicable
environmental conditions can be in other parts of the world as a result of
refining metals that are used elsewhere. Both episodes suggest that by
permitting toxic pollutants to be emitted somewhere, we open the possibility that
they will be accepted everywhere.
What
else do we have a lot of in the United States? How about cell phones,
computers, and video game consoles? Among countries with at least ten million
people, the U.S. is third in computers per capita. We have about one computer
for every 1.3 person. Why is this a problem, shouldn’t every one have use of a
computer? Well, computers have lots of toxic materials in them (e.g., lead,
mercury, cadmium, brominated flame retardants, beryllium, and many plastic
derivates). These chemicals come out of the ground (i.e., they are mined)
somewhere. Not surprisingly they are usually extracted where it is most
expedient (economically) to do so. This race to the economic bottom driven by
our insatiable need for electronic gadgets has serious ramifications.
One rare metal found in electronic equipment is
coltan. According to the U.S. Geologic Survey, about 25% of all tantalum (a
metallic element extracted from coltan ore) comes from the Democratic Republic
of the Congo (DRC) in central Africa. According to several international
agencies, Congolese coltan brings such a high price in the marketplace
(anywhere from $50-$300 per pound) that it has fueled major fighting and human
rights violations in eastern Congo (which has spilled over into neighboring
countries); similar conflicts centered on prized gems found their way into the
recent movie, Blood Diamond (2006). Additionally, the mining practices
utilized in these areas are notorious for destroying the inner forest which further
reduces already sparse habitat for the endangered mountain gorillas found
there. So who would have thought that the use of computers, cell phones and
video games might be connected with the murder of poor and desperate humans and
the extinction of one of the few remaining primates?
So is
everything so doom and gloom? Absolutely not. There are many positive things
happening. In fact, according to environmental guru, Paul Hawken, the “largest
social movement in history is [underway], restoring grace, justice, and beauty
to the world.” His book, Blessed Unrest, lays out the history and
foundations for this movement—which brings traditional environmentalists
together with social reformers, human rights advocates, teachers,
agriculturists, and spiritual leaders. In a presentation he gave at the 2006
Bioneers Conference, Paul so poignantly communicated the immense scope of this
movement through a video that scrolled through a list of organizations found
throughout the world that are working for “social and environmental justice.”
According to his calculations, this list, undoubtedly incomplete, could scroll
at a leisurely pace for more than four days before reaching its end! So where
are these many bright spots? Short on space, I’ll list a few:
· Kenyans
have been planting trees for decades. Starting in 1977, “The Greenbelt
Movement” (www.greenbeltmovement.org)
continues to empower people worldwide to understand and engage directly with
their local environment as a means to improving their lives.
· In
South Africa, starting in 1995 and continuing to this day, Working for Water (a
public works project; www.dwaf.gov.za/wfw/) has employed many people in the
activity of cutting down non-native trees in order to increase stream flow in
rivers.
· In
the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the Middle East’s largest solar power plant is
in the process of being built. Masdar City, considered by some at “most
ambitious sustainable development in the world today,” will
serve as its home as well as residence to 50,000 people. Masdar is planning to
be carbon neutral and cars will not be
allowed (www.masdaruae.com).
· Belgium’s
first national park opened in 2006 due to the persistent efforts of Ignace
Schops and a consortium of groups, including the nation’s largest coal company.
Hoge Kempen, as the park is named, will be a wonderful site to visit for
generations to come.
· In
Oaxaca, Mexico, the Center for Integral Small Farmer Development in Mixteca
(CEDICAM) has been working tirelessly to renew a region formerly characterized
by highly disturbed land with rich, fertile soil. Using traditional techniques,
such as planting trees and digging ditches, these indigenous people located in
southern Mexico are reconnecting the local farmers with sustainable practices.
Currently more than 1,500 farmers are involved in this project.
· The
nation of Bhutan, wedged between India and China, continues using “Gross
National Happiness” as a measure of the health of society rather than strict
economic metrics (such as Gross National Product) as used in most other
countries. Its respect and valuation of its rich ecological resources (over 70%
of the nation is covered by native forest and shrubland) serves as a model for
other countries to emulate.
· Denmark
recently approved a huge off-shore wind turbine park. Once completed, this
project will provide energy for ~400,000 homes. This serves as a sustainable
alternative to off-shore drilling which appears to be U.S. policy even under
President Barack Obama leadership.
A
lot is going on, much under our radar. Our lives are inextricably linked to
major environmental problems in many parts of the world. However, not all is
gloom. If we become informed and act on this knowledge, we can build a better
future for all.
Peter Schwartzman (email:
wordnerdauthor@gmail.com) is associate professor and chair of the Department of
Environmental Studies at Knox College. Father to two amazing girls, Peter hopes
that their lives will be lived on a less-toxic, more just, more loving planet.
A nationally-ranked Scrabble® junkie, he is also the founder and maintainer of
websites dedicated to peace and environmental well-being (www.onehuman.org
& www.blackthornhill.org) as well as cofounder of The Center
(thecenteringalesburg.org).