The polling results I've seen from both sides of the
debate say more of you will vote for a state constitutional convention this
November than say you won't.
The numbers still aren't there yet. The question on
the fall ballot must either be supported by 60 percent or by at least half of
all those voting in the election itself. Still, it's getting there.
I'm one of those who supports a constitutional
convention. And after 18 years of covering Illinois politics, I am not only
convinced that a convention is necessary, I also believe I have a duty to tell
you why.
Last week, I explained to you how our current state
constitution has allowed legislative leaders and the governor to seize
infinitely more power than the constitution's framers ever dreamt, and how that
power grab is destroying our system of government.
This week, I'd like to toss around a few ideas that
a convention might address to break at least some of that stranglehold.
Before I do, always keep in mind that once a
convention is called, you have the right to elect all the delegates. When those
delegates finish their task, you have the right to vote up or down on all
proposed changes. Voters have the final word on everything.
One of the biggest Statehouse problems is that
legislative leaders can serve as long as they can get themselves reelected. I
started to notice many moons ago that with every new session I covered, I
gained a bit more respect and influence. That happens for pretty much everyone
who sticks around. And it's even more true for leaders, like the House speaker
and Senate president, because they have so much institutional power to begin
with.
Limiting a leader to ten years of controlling the
gavel would allow the Statehouse a fresh start on a regular basis.
But there is still the almost incomprehensible
institutional power which the leaders already own. A new face every decade
won't change that fact.
One of the most refreshing reform suggestions I've
heard is to require nonpartisan, computerized legislative redistricting.
Our legislative district maps look like they were
drawn by crazy people. They're all over the place, weaving this way and that
for miles on end.
In reality, they are carefully constructed by the
powers that be every ten years to protect their favored incumbents.
Voters don't choose their politicians, politicians
actually choose their voters. As a result, only a small handful of incumbents
ever have to face a serious opponent, all courtesy of their leaders who
carefully draw the district maps.
Iowa's legislative districts look more like squares.
Iowa requires the use of a computer program which completely disregards party
and power favoritism. Illinois has far more minority voters than Iowa, which
would require more complicated district outlines to make sure a federal judge
doesn't kill it off, but this can be done here. The result? Lots more
competition and far less reliance on all-powerful leaders.
Our campaign finance laws allow unlimited
contributions by legislative leaders to their favored candidates. The leaders
control most of the money raised in this state, so there's no way those laws
will ever change because the
leaders also completely control the lawmaking process. A constitutional
convention could curtail that fundraising power or eliminate it altogether.
Leaders appoint all committee chairmen, all members
of those committees and all bills sent to those committees. This ensures that
the chairmen and members always do their leaders' bidding. Stop that, and you
take away a huge amount of power.
Some people favor recall and term limits for all
legislators. I'm an agnostic on recall and I'm pretty sure that term limits for
legislators in general (not leaders, just legislators) would be a bad idea, but
that can all be up for debate if there is a constitutional convention. Others
want to give citizens a right to pass laws on their own through ballot
initiatives. That could be chaotic, but certainly interesting.
Nothing is guaranteed in life, of course. None of
these reforms may come to pass even with a constitutional convention. But none
of it will ever happen without one. So, once again, please vote "Yes"
this November.
Next week, we'll take a look at what can be done to
rein in the governor's excessive powers.
Rich Miller
also publishes Capitol Fax, a daily political newsletter, and
thecapitolfaxblog.com.