Off the shelf by
Lynn McKeown
Clyde S. Kilby, Minority of One, Eerdmans, 1959,
reprinted 1982.
Jonathan Blanchard is one
of the few former Galesburg residents besides the famous twosome, Sandburg and
Reagan, to be the subject of a full-length biography. In Blanchards case it is
³Minority of One,² published 46 years ago by Wheaton College professor Clyde
Kilby. It tells the story of a fascinating 5; and somewhat contradictory 5;
man.
Blanchard was president of
Knox College from 1845 to 1857. Galesburg historian Earnest Calkins called him
the ³ablest man² in the early history of the college. By the time he came to
assume the college presidency Blanchard already had a reputation as a leader in
the movement to abolish slavery. After he left Galesburg, he went on to become
president of Wheaton College, and there, as at Knox, he seems to have played a
crucial role in putting the school on a sound financial footing. And yet...
If Blanchard was a dynamic
and progressive force in the early history of Midwestern colleges, he was
during his life and for long afterward a highly controversial figure. One of
his strongest critics was Carl Sandburg. In ³Always the Young Strangers²
Sandburg describes Blanchard in several emotion-charged pages as one who was
notable for the many things he hated and who instigated ³a storm of jealousies
and rivalries that ran for years and came near being the ruin of Knox College.²
Calkins, in his history of
Galesburg, ³They Broke the Prairie,² gives a more balanced portrait of
Blanchard and his years in the area, but, in a more subtle way, he too presents
an unflattering view, telling stories which cast Blanchard in a rather negative
light, including the famous one involving a confrontation between Blanchard and
a railroad engineer. (More about that later.)
The dust jacket of
³Minority of One² contains the phrase (maybe a slight exaggeration) ³the man
who established two American colleges.² It also has an early portrait of
Blanchard framed by what appears to be a clenched fist with a cross on the
wrist, an interesting and probably appropriate emblem. The motto at the
beginning of the book is a quote from Blanchard, ³The minorities have done the
good in this world: the majorities only register it.²
Author Kilby, at the time
of his book, was a writer for evangelical religious publications and Chairman
of the English Department at Wheaton
College, a school with a strong evangelical Christian tradition and one where
the Blanchard name, because of both Jonathan and his son Charles, also
president of the college for many years, was highly revered. (One of the main
buildings of that college is Blanchard Hall.)
After reading Calkins and
Sandburgs accounts of Blanchard, I was intrigued by the prospect of another
view which I suspected would be different and more favorable. I found that to
be true of ³Minority of One² but also was pleasantly surprised to find that if,
as one would suspect, it was overwhelmingly favorable to its subject, it also
seemed a good professional job of biography-writing. The author, though obviously
sympathetic to the evangelical Christian point of view (He later became a
recognized authority on C.S. Lewis), seems to stick to the facts of Blanchards
quite interesting life. And, as one would also expect from a professor of
English, it is well written.
Jonathan Blanchard was
born, the eleventh of 15 children, on a farm near Rockingham, Vermont in 1811.
He grew up helping with work on the farm and seems to have always operated a
working farm wherever he went though the rest of his life. (During his years in
Galesburg he owned 500 acres of farmland.) Young Jonathan started attending
school at the age of four and was called ³Bible Blanchard² because he sometimes
brought the family Bible with him to class.
There is also a story,
repeated by several writers, of Jonathan destroying a jug of cider brandy
intended for his fathers workmen. It seems to be taken as evidence of his
moral earnestness (or puritanical nature) and no one mentions his fathers
reaction to the incident. Jonathan was only 15 when he left home and became a
schoolteacher in western Vermont. Soon afterward he decided to continue his
education at the Chester Academy. In spite of his affinity for the family
Bible, Kilby says Jonathan was ³not a professing Christian² at this time.
Blanchard seems to have
enjoyed dancing and card-playing as a young man, and while studying Greek and
Latin authors he translated classic erotic love poetry. But while at the
Academy he apparently had a religious experience in which, according to Kilby,
he ³was born again, or, in the idiom of the time, he began to hope in
Christ.² Blanchard was now set on a course as a serious and committed
fundamentalist Christian.
Later in his career
Blanchard was the minister at a church in Cincinnati, where he took part in a
week-long, widely-reported debate with another minister named Rice on the
question of whether slavery was sinful. The result was a book called ³Debate on
Slavery,² which has become something of a classic in the history of the
abolitionist movement. Later, when Blanchard had come to Galesburg, he took
part in a similar debate with the famous Senator Stephen Douglas. This was a
few years before the more famous debates between Douglas and Lincoln.
During these early years Blanchard
was becoming widely known as a preacher against both slavery and ³secret
societies,² such as the Masons. In several instances, before he came to Galesburg,
he narrowly missed being the object of violence from angry mobs opposed to his
anti-slavery views. In these early years, also, he became friends with many in
the abolitionist movement, including the famous Beecher family. Harriet Beecher
Stowe, whose novel ³Uncle Toms Cabin² was of great importance in turning the
public against slavery, became a friend of Blanchards wife Mary, an attractive
woman with intelligence and abilities apparently equal to her husbands. (Kilby
laments that all of Blanchards love letters from his courting days were
apparently destroyed.)
One of Blanchards
strangest friendships, perhaps, was that with Thaddeus Stevens, a loose-living,
foul-mouthed Congressman quite different in personal habits but sharing
Blanchards hatred of slavery.
After a number of years in
Galesburg, during which he obtained much financial help for the college from
his wealthy abolitionist friends, Blanchard left the presidency of Knox College
5; was almost run out of town, in effect 5; as a result of what has
been called a schism that split apart both the college and the town.
Blanchard and college founder George Washington Gale had not gotten along well
for many years. Some of the trustees developed a plan asking both Gale and
Blanchard to resign in the interest of harmony on the campus. Other factors
were involved, especially a conflict for control of the college between Presbyterians
and Congregationalists.
There were impassioned meetings,
many published attacks in newspapers and pamphlets, a boycott of commencement
by most of the graduating class (just nine students) and a general, rather unchristian
level of vituperation that persisted for a time, until Blanchard agreed to
serve for one more year and then leave.
As you might expect, Kilby
gives an account of this incident very much favoring Blanchard, including much
about the support he received from the student body, who seem to have idolized
him for many reasons, including Blanchards strong abolitionist fervor. Kilbys
account of the ³schism² is interesting to read alongside Calkins. Neither may
have the final truth on what may seem 5; from a modern perspective 5;
a strange event.
Undoubtedly the most
well-known story about Blanchard is one involving his confrontation with a
railway engineer. As Earnest Calkins tells it, an unnamed engineer was
preparing to leave the station for a scheduled Sunday run on the newly
established railroad. Blanchard appeared and told the man to stop. The engineer
ask who he was and Blanchard replied, ³I am President Blanchard of Knox
College, and again I order you to take that engine to the roundhouse and not
run this train on Sunday.² To which the engineer replied, ³Well, President
Blanchard of Knox College, you can go to hell and mind your own business, and
Ill take my train out as ordered.² Sandburg also tells this story in Always
the Young Strangers.²
Kilby, in ³Minority of
One,² goes to considerable length to question the storys truth. He notes that
Blanchard himself ³made a categorical denial of the anecdote,² which he said
was ³invented² by a railroad conductor. Kilby further argues that Blanchard was
too sophisticated to do something of this sort. True, he opposed most activity
other than worship on the Sabbath, but Kilby argues he was too intelligently
aware of changes taking place in society to attempt such a quixotic gesture.
Kilby tells another story
about Blanchard that may give a more accurate view of a complex man 5; and
this one is probably more authentic. After he left Galesburg and was
established as the president of Wheaton College, Blanchard again was involved
in controversy, and again it aroused strong feelings in townspeople as well as
the college. This incident involved a young professor who was being dismissed
from the college and, some felt, not treated fairly.
Blanchard was travelling on
a train when a Wheaton resident, on the opposite side of the controversy,
confronted him. The man began berating Blanchard ³in his face,² as we would say
in the modern phrase. Blanchard did what some others might do but what a
Christian minister presumably shouldnt do 5; punched the man in the jaw.
As if prepared for this outcome, the man went immediately to a lawyer who was
also on the train and arranged for an assault charge to be brought against the
pugilistic minister.
Blanchard made his appearance
in court, pled guilty and paid a three-dollar fine. A lawyer told him he might
contest the charge on grounds he was provoked, but Blanchard said no, he had
indeed struck the man, though, positioned as he was up against the wall of the
train, he hadnt got a good swing. After his court appearance the conscientious
college president called a convocation and explained his actions to the student
body, taking the blame for losing his temper.
After finishing ³Minority
of One,² and especially after comparing it with the different views of
Blanchard given by Calkins and Sandburg, the reader is left with questions
about a fascinating and contradictory man. Blanchard was a man who hated many
things, as Sandburg said. He hated drinking and dancing, yet, as Kilby notes,
he was a man who enjoyed playing the flute to entertain his grandchildren. He
was moralistic and possibly overbearing, yet in letters to his daughter Mary
quoted by Kilby he seems a considerate father. (The daughter seems to have been
a match for him in her headstrong nature.)
Blanchard always seems to
have believed he was a crusader against an evil world, a minority against the
prevailing corrupt majority. In the later years of his life Blanchard was much
involved in a campaign against secret societies, especially the Masons, for
which Calkins, in a subtle way, holds him up to ridicule and which seems
incomprehensible today. Yet one of the other objects of his hatred 5; the
one which most characterized his early life 5; was slavery. From the
perspective of history, he seems to have been absolutely right in that case.
Calkinss account of
Blanchards years in Galesburg paints a wry and subtly negative picture.
Sandburgs portrait is even more damning. (Might it really be Sandburgs negative
reaction to fundamentalist religion in general?) Kilbys biography gives
another, more positive view of a rather complicated man. Perhaps, together, all
three accounts give a rounded view of one of the most dynamic 5; and
controversial 5; men in early Galesburg history.
³Minority of One² is now
out of print but copies are available at the Galesburg Public Library and the
Knox College Library, and are available for sale from booksellers on the
Internet.