Ira
Smolensky
Shame
on Rudy
Run for the
hills.
The
Democrats are coming.
Or so
presidential wannabe Rudy Giuliani (and many of his fellow Republicans) would
have us believe.
According
to these stalwart patriots (or shameless demagogues, depending how you look at
it), the war on terror will be lost if a Democrat is elected to the presidency
in 2008.
As everyone
knows, I am usually a sweet and cuddly guy, the meek sort of person who, it is
written, will some day inherit the earth.
But GiulianiÕs
tactic really steams me up.
For one
thing, who are Republicans to talk?
Their man has been in the White House from the outset of this war, and
the results have been much less than spectacular.
On
9-11-Õ01, George W. Bush and Co. allowed the nation to absorb one of the
nastiest sucker punches in history.
Shortly thereafter, for reasons that remain obscure, they diverted the
war on terror into Iraq, where they have gotten us hopelessly bogged down in a nasty
civil war and actually made some Iraqis miss the bad olÕ days of Saddam
Hussein.
Along the
way, Bush has squandered the moral high ground that the nation held following
the treacherous brutality of 9-11.
He has done so by displaying world class arrogance, gleefully abridging
human rights, and generally Ōspeaking with forked tongue.Ķ
Of course,
everyone knows all of this.
Which is
why Giuliani and Co. are going hard after Democrats.
Since
BushÕs performance with regard to the war on terror is
indefensible—something that Republican candidates cannot openly admit
without shooting themselves in the foot— attention must be shifted to the
allegedly lily livered tendencies of Democrats, who soon will have us all donning
the veil (even men) and slouching toward Medina.
I guess
this could just be seen as American politics as usual—better to be a
victorious scoundrel than a lovable (or even respectable) loser. Moreover, the tactic seems to have
worked in 2004, when Republicans banded together to promote the myth that John
Kerry lacked the solid round spheres needed to properly fight terror.
But there
is something a bit more odious going on here.
According
to these same Republicans, criticism of our war effort emboldens the
enemy. Now, I donÕt know that this
is actually true. Rather, I think
our enemies are emboldened by the same thing as the American architects of the
war in Iraq, a belief that, in our post-modern, morally confusing world, might
makes right (or, at the very least, might makes history).
Nevertheless,
Republicans apparently believe strongly in their own emboldenment theory. It is, therefore, particularly
unpatriotic of them to suggest that a Democratic victory in 2008 would weaken
our war effort, since that clearly would embolden our enemies to hang on and
fight at least until the 2008 results are in. In essence, Republicans are criticizing the Democratic led
war effort before the fact, and therefore, by their own admission, emboldening
the enemy.
This seems
to me to be a particularly low and disgusting tactic, one I would be ashamed to
even entertain let alone employ full speed ahead.
But Rudy
Giuliani apparently feels no such shame.
His eyes
are on the prize.
And his
sense of decency?
That,
folks, is in the wastebasket.
5/3/07