Remembering
the 1981 South African Rugby Tour
By Alun
Thomas
It
may not be headline news or worthy of retrospect in anywhere but New Zealand
and South Africa, but the months of July through September mark the twenty
fifth anniversary of the 1981 South African rugby tour to New Zealand, a tour
that incited national protests and violence on a scale that had never been
witnessed in the nations history. For two months protestors clashed with police
in ongoing battles in order to halt a tour that flagrantly violated the 1976
Gleneagles Agreement in which all sporting contact with South Africa was barred
due to the ongoing Apartheid situation. New Zealand flouted it in 1976 by
touring South Africa, which led to African boycotts at the 1976 Olympics. Bear
in mind this was undertaken by the National Party, the country's equivalent of
the Republicans. The previous government, Labour (Democrat) had banned such
tours. A typical move from such a party, National, who's agenda turned out
weaker than George Bush's currently is.
The issue split the country in two.
Where do sport and politics mix? On one hand you had fanatical rugby supporters
determined to reaquaint old rivalries with our fiercest opponent while on the
other were groups like HART (Halt All Racist Tours) who were defiant in the
face of such blatant racism that was being practiced by the South African
government. The New Zealand Prime Minister Robert Muldoon declared as a
democracy the country was free to pursue any sporting venture it pleased. What
his real agenda was I am uncertain, but 1981 was an Election year. The tour
therefore went ahead. Surely Muldoon could not have foreseen the ugly scenes
that would follow. It woke a nation up, one that was relatively free of such
incidents, for the most part to my knowledge you could say New Zealand was
placid up to that point.
By 1981 unemployment was creeping in,
Pacific Islanders were increasing in population and Maori's were openly voicing
concerns about land rights which dated back to the 1840's. This combination of
factors possibly fueled the battles which followed. Rugby fans were a different
breed however and probably still are. The image in 1981 of beer drinking
farmers, university students and wife beaters was probably stronger then than
it is now. To them defeating South Africa meant rugby supremacy. But the day
the South African's arrived the protestors were instantly mobilised. The Police
devised the infamous Red and Blue Squads to handle the crowds. But the vocal
demonstrations quickly dissolved into pitch invasions and attempts to have
games postponed.
As a five year old I was too young to
appreciate this scenario and it was only in 1990 when I viewed the book By
Batons And Barbed Wires that I caught a glimpse into how heated the tour was.
The most famous incident was the abandonment of a game in Waikato when
protestors made it onto the field and caused the game to be called off.
Watching the documentary 'Patu' which chronicled the protestors side it is
frightening to see the hatred the rugby supporters unleashed on the invaders
when they were escorted off the pitch. Massive beer bottles were hurled, those
of the thick gallon size almost, with the irate fans getting their shots in
where possible. For the time it was unbelievable.
That set the tone for scuffles
nationwide and the police showed little mercy, clubbing defenceless protestors
with batons, leaving a mass of bloodied and wounded in their wake. In
unprecedented scenes barbed wire was placed around the pitch to prevent more
invasions. Imagine that sight. A game of simple rugby, barricaded by barbed
wire. It was as crude as it looked. The actual rugby was irrelevant in the
overall course of the tour, few mention it. Why would they? The country was in
self perceived turmoil and the sight of protestors in motorcycle helmets to
protect their craniums was unforgettable.
In hindsight the book that caught my
attention about the tour was from the point of view of the protesters, so the
many images of beaten marchers and the ugly pig like faces of the police and
beer holding rugby fans was perhaps slanted. It may have made the incidents
look worse than they were, but footage I've seen indicated this wasn't entirely
true, as the final test between the All Blacks and South Africa contained the
fiercest protests of the tour, ironically on the last game. By then the 'stop
the tour' leaflets were jokeworthy.
It didn't stop an overhead plane
however from dropping flour bombs onto Eden Park to disrupt the game, one of
which hit All Black Alan Whetton. The Blacks won the game and the three test
series 2-1, but that was a non factor as the streets turned into third world
war areas, with molotov cocktails thrown, cars overturned and unarmed
protestors dressed as clowns being beaten to a pulp. Thankfully it was the
final incident but the fallout never faded. The police brutality brigade came
out in force afterwards, but really it seems there was little other way to
handle things. Sometimes you need an event like this to see what a nation is
made of.
Rugby itself really took a nosedive as
the country's main sport. Soccer boomed for a few years as Rugby languished in
the face of the tour. Many will still claim it was just supposed to be about
rugby, little else. That was the motivation. To ruin the matches for rugby die
hards was intolerable. The urge to continue playing South Africa was so strong
a renegade outfit known as the Cavaliers toured South Africa in 1986 and were
handily beaten as skipper Andy Dalton had his jaw broken from a punch by a
South African. Only when the All
Blacks won the inaugral World Cup in 1987 did the tour finally fade to many
degrees in my opinion.
The National party was voted out in
1984, but were on hand through most of the 90's when Apartheid collapsed and
all sporting contact was re-established with South Africa. To this day I
believe South African rugby never quite recovered, despite winning the World
Cup in 1995. They always run hot and cold and all the years out of the picture
took their toll. Should a sport be heavily penalised for a nations doctrines? It
is always debatable and taking either side of the fence is impossible. What it
showed was New Zealanders in their thousands believed otheriwse and opposed
everything South Africa stood for. The resulting chaos has never been repeated
except for a 1984 riot in downtown Auckland which summarised a nation heading
to economic and social decline. The tour indicated New Zealand was far from
free of melting down.