America's
War on Drugs: Misguided efforts that waste resources and sacrifice civil
liberties
by
Mike Kroll
Historically wars exact a huge cost in national
treasure, lives lost, victims injured and liberty sacrificed. Politicians who
start or promote wars typically do so by advocating the action as a response to
some great evil; real, imagined or (most commonly) grossly exaggerated. And
once such a war is commenced politicians discover that to save political face
they must continue to misrepresent the facts and sustain the illusion that if
we only assert the will to continue the fight and pay the mounting costs some
day the war can be won.
This political fiction is as true about the War in
Iraq as it is about the much older War on Drugs. There is no denying that the
costs have been very high in both instances and the rationale either fiction,
fantasy or self-serving ignorance. And ultimately neither war is winnable and a
honorable exit strategy elusive at best. Perhaps what is saddest about both of
these wars is that so much real good could have been accomplished with the
resources squandered.
According to figures from the Office of National Drug
Control Policy and the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at
Columbia University the annual financial cost of the Drug War tops $50 billion
with $30 billion of that spent by state and local governments. At an estimated
2.3 million inmates America leads the world in its rate of incarceration and
over half of those inmates are serving time for drug-related offenses. By
year-end 2006 drug arrests are expected to exceed 1.5 people according to the
FBI with well over half of those arrests involving marijuana. Today over
400,000 law enforcement officers are dedicated full-time to the War on Drugs; a
number that far exceeds
The first real national efforts to combat drug use
with law enforcement date back to the Harrison Narcotic Act in 1914 that first
regulated the interstate distribution of opiate related drugs although a number
of states had previously passed legislation controlling narcotics. The amount
of attention devoted to drug control was minor at the time and easily eclipsed
by religious-based efforts to ban other more traditional vices such as alcohol,
gambling and prostitution. In 1919 America began the failed experiment of
alcohol prohibition that closely mirrors today's war of drugs in both approach
and effectiveness. The nation lost faith it that crusade in 1933 when
Prohibition was repealed.
Today's war on drugs can be traced directly to the
Nixon administration. In 1969, during the height of the Viet Nam war and the
growing anti-war sentiment in America, Nixon declared drugs as ÒAmerica's
public enemy number oneÓ and in 1970 Congress approved the Controlled
Substances Act and greatly increased Federal funding of law enforcement against
drugs. Both the effort and funding was ratcheted up again during the Reagan
administration.
Prohibition didn't work with alcohol then and it isn't
working with drugs today (nor gambling or prostitution either). The very notion
of protecting citizens from themselves is nothing more that the imposition of a
religious moral code on behaviors that date back to ancient times. America was
founded upon a notion of freedom and individual liberty. The founding fathers
envisioned a government that stayed out of the private lives of its citizens
unless a citizen's action posed a danger to the welfare of his neighbor. This
is why we have laws that prohibit theft, assault and murder; because such
actions involve the involuntary exposure of others to harm.
Government has a right and duty to protect us from
abuse by others but not to interfere in bad decision making that puts no one
else at risk. I will not attempt to argue here that drug use is not potentially
harmful but I do contend that in this country adults should be free to make
choices that others disapprove of so long as the consequences of those
decisions do not pose a direct or indirect risk to the welfare of others. The
legally defensible approach is that today used in conjunction to alcohol.
Intoxicants may be legally sold, possessed and used by adults but it is illegal
to engage in behavior while under the influence that poses risks to others.
There is plenty of evidence to show that legal
substances such as alcohol and tobacco pose at least as great a health danger
as non-prescription drug use. Prohibition proved that the costs of making
alcohol illegal exceeded the gains and the same is true of non-prescription
drugs today. There is no credible evidence that the War on Drugs has accomplished anything other than to create the
opportunity for criminals to profit greatly by trafficking. Prohibiting the
sale possession and use of non-prescription drugs has merely caused the retail
price of these drugs to skyrocket making them more and more attractive as a
criminal enterprise.
Historical data show that law enforcement efforts have
had minimal impact on drug use. Data from the Department of Health and Human
Services show that nearly half of the U.S. population admits to having used an
illegal drug at least once in their lifetime, that's over 112 million Americans
over the age of 12. Over 35 million Americans report used an illegal drug
during the last 12 months; most of those (over 25.4 million) identified the
drug used as marijuana.
The same federal data show that over 198 million
Americans over 12 have used alcohol in their lifetimes and nearly 172 million
have tried tobacco at least once. Almost 121 million Americans drank alcohol
this past month and over 70 smoked this month. The documented health risks of
both tobacco and alcohol use easily exceed that of marijuana. For example, in a
study of deaths in the United States during 2000 the leading cause accounting
for over 18 percent of all deaths was tobacco (435,000 deaths); alcohol
accounted for 3.5 percent or 85,000 deaths; illegal drug use other than
marijuana 17,000 deaths; and absolutely no deaths were attributed to marijuana
use. Over 30 times as many deaths were attributed to ÒlegalÓ drugs alcohol and
tobacco than illegal drugs.
Perhaps the most egregious cost of the War on Drugs is
how much of our civil liberties have been eroded because of it. Nearly every
medium to large city now operate para-military style police units that
specialize in drug raids on homes. Often times the standard of evidence
necessary to obtain a warrant for such a raid is nothing more than the word or
an informant compelled to cooperated for his or her self-interest. Most of the
techniques now used in the War on Terrorism were first developed for use in the
Drug War. Warrantless searches, seizure of property upon arrest, wide-ranging
wiretaps and the general erosion of the cornerstone of the American judicial
system; that one is innocent until proven guilty; all the result of the War on
Drugs.
The time has come for America to reexamine our
approach to non-prescription drugs. Marijuana should be either legalized,
regulated and taxed just like alcohol and tobacco or, at the very least, use
and possession should be decriminalized. We need to take redirect law
enforcement efforts away from drugs but the fear among those in law enforcement
is that without the drug war it will be hard to justify the huge expenditures
for law enforcement as the crime rate drops. Similarly, America's prison and
jail population will plummet and should enable us to close many older prisons
and jails. The money raised through taxation and/or saved could be spent on
some combination of drug treatment, education and job training programs.