Zephyr buys Register-Mail
-- At least some shares of it –
by Norm Winick
The Zephyr, Galesburg
08/07/08
Some faithful readers may remember that headline from one
of our April FoolÕs editions years ago. That time, we paid 50 cents for a copy from a vending machine. This time,
my 50 cents on Monday bought me a share of GateHouse Media, Inc., the owner of
the Register-Mail and 97 other daily newspapers plus hundreds of weeklies.
(Actually, in the interest of full disclosure, I bought 400 shares for $200.
Also, in the interest of full disclosure, I will admit that I have spent that
much or more on other unwise investments (Betamax, anyone?))
The savaging by Wall Street of newspaper stocks is a major
problem for the companies that publish them and weÕre right in the heart it.
The President and Chief Operating Officer of GateHouse is Scott T. Champion who
lives in Monmouth and has his office in Galesburg. Lee Enterprises, the company
that owns the Quad City Times and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, which has seen
its market value plummet from $2 billion in 2004 to $132 million today, is
based in Davenport.
GateHouse, when the firm went public in 2006, was valued by
the market at about $1.2 billion with the stock at about $22 a share. Today,
its market capitalization is about $26 million. ThatÕs a drop of almost 98
percent. When we ran our April FoolÕs edition parodying the Register-Mail, it
alone had sold for $15 million.
GateHouseÕs stock was worth about $17 a share a year ago,
$9 a share six months ago, $6 in April, $4 in June, $2.50 in July and has been
as low as 40¢ a share in August already. If it stays below $1, it will be
delisted by the New York Stock Exchange. ItÕs already traded only
electronically rather than on the floor.
GateHouse is not alone. The Sun-Times Media Group is down
91 percent. Even the big guys are hurting. The New York Times is down 26
percent; the Washington Post 24 percent and Gannett is down 52 percent —
all in the last year. In the first ten trading days of July, newspaper shares
lost $4 billion in value.
Sam ZellÕs purchase of the Tribune Company is a disaster
for him, too. He took it private but heÕs cutting costs as fast as he can and
trying to sell whatever assets he can unload. He recently announced the sale of
the very profitable Newsday.
This makes newspapers an incredible bargain — if
anyone were buying them — which they are not.
The owners of all papers, from The Zephyr to The New York
Times, are in major cost-cutting mode. Besides the drastic rise in the costs of
newsprint, ink and transportation on which the industry relies, readership is
down dramatically.
The biggest expense in running a newspaper is personnel and
thousands of newspaper people have lost their jobs this year and more layoffs
are announced almost every day.
GateHouse is not alone in making their papers smaller to
save paper and ink. They have discontinued Monday editions and gone to
five-day-a-week schedules for many of their smaller dailies which lets one
40-hour crew do the job.
In addition to layoffs, big papers are also trimming down,
closing news bureaus and cutting back on distribution. The Chicago Tribune no
longer gets to Galesburg every morning.
The demise of the major metropolitan daily was first
predicted when radio came on the scene, then with television, but newspapers
survived, even flourished despite the competition from those media.
Radio and TV didnÕt cover news stories in depth; they
didnÕt provide a forum for readers to write in and express their opinions; they
didnÕt allow advertisers the flexibility to explain their products in detail.
Then came the Internet. News became free. It became
instantaneous and as detailed as you wanted. Websites could easily include all
the information that could fit in a newspaper ad. Surfers could add their
comments and read others — instantly. While haste may have led to accuracy
suffering, conscientious readers could verify information; others believe what
they want anyway.
And instead of figuring out a way to compete with the
Internet, newspapers joined the revolution and are contributing to their own
demise.
We all know Galesburgers who look at the Register-Mail
online and have let their subscriptions lapse — and there are probably
thousands who have done so.
Internet advertising generates but a small fraction of the
revenue generated by print advertising. People expect news sites to be free.
Big companies being big companies, their response is
drastic cost-cutting. While that may help them weather the storm for a short
time — and thatÕs doubtful —
the endemic problems arenÕt going away and the product they will have
remaining will possess a fraction of its previous value as a news source and as
an advertising medium.
Ted Rall, a very liberal columnist who is probably not read
by newspaper executives who wouldnÕt want to hear his ideas to save their
floundering industry, sent us his most recent syndicated column where he
outlines the problems and makes some revolutionary suggestions to save
newspapers.
He claims that cost-cutting can never close the gap. ÒA
reader of the New York Times print edition generates 170 times as much revenue
as someone who surfs their website.Ó He says that readers spend an average of
47 minutes with the print edition but browsers only stay on the site for an
average of seven minutes. ÒThere just isn;t enough budget to cut in a future
where income has dropped to 1/170th.Ó
Espousing Keynesian economics, where scarcity increases
demand, Rall says that newspapers can only save themselves by becoming more
valuable — scarcer.
ÒNewspapers have made news free and plentiful, which is why
they are going broke.Ó
His three-point plan will meet with wide resistance and is
anathema to everything that newspapers have been doing.
First, he says newspapers should go offline and shut down
their websites. ÒStop giving away news! At the very least, papers should charge
online readers twice as much for print subscriptions.Ó
Second, he says newspapers should copyright every article.
The vast majority of news sources on the web do not actually report any news;
they post stories reported and published by others. Newspapers are paying the
reporters and all their expenses and others are taking advantage of it. Even
radio and TV stations frequently read stories out of newspapers without paying
for them.
Thirdly, Rall says that newspapers should stop feeding
stories to the wire services where other media get to use them cheaply.
Newspapers should charge what stories are worth to anyone else using them.
He admits that there are some serious problems with his
ideas. They only work if every newspaper participates. They would also mean a
vast decrease in the amount of information available to citizens in our society.
The chances of the Internet ceasing to be the news source
of choice for Americans, especially younger ones, is slim. The fear that some
(or many) newspapers will cease publishing is real. Unless owners with
philanthropic motives (like those of us who contribute their time to The
Zephyr) take over, the future for dead-tree publishing appears bleak.