Preserving
freedom the NRA way
By
Mike Kroll
The National Rifle Association, a group of four
million but with political clout far larger, held its 135th Annual Meeting in
Milwaukee this past weekend. The weather was wonderful and despite major road
construction hassles the NRA expected 60,000 to attend the three and a half-day
show that ended Sunday. Billboards in Milwaukee boasted of Òacres of guns and
gearÓ on display at the Midwest Airlines Center and that was no exaggeration.
Hanging banners in and around the convention sites featured celebrities like
Tom Selleck and Charleton Heston and the slogan ÒI am the NRAÓ or the theme of
this meeting ÒFreedom's 2nd Army.Ó
This is a major convention held in a somewhat unlikely
state. Wisconsin is not one of the 40-some states that currently permit
citizens to carry concealed handguns despite strenuous efforts by the NRA and
its supporters. Most recently the Wisconsin legislature fell two votes short of
overriding Governor Jim Doyle's (D) veto of concealed carry legislation. But it
is more likely that Milwaukee was targeted for exactly that reason. Signs and
stickers proclaiming ÒDump DoyleÓ could be found throughout the meeting hall
and a seminar on grassroots political organization was conducted Friday
morning.
Most of the NRA events were free to NRA members and
their families, uniformed police and military or children under 12 accompanied
by an adult. Non-member adults needed to purchase a $10 associate membership in
the NRA to gain admittance. Once inside the cavernous exhibit hall most every
imaginable gun or hunting related product was available to see, handle and
purchase (excluding guns themselves).
The exhibit hall was crowded on Friday when Norm
Winick and I attended. Interestingly those present looked just like a crowd of
Target shoppers, although lily white. We counted only four blacks total as we
walked the exhibit floor and one of those was a woman working for the
convention center. Both the exhibitors and the attendees appeared solidly
middle-class and there were absolutely none of the stereotypical Òredneck gun
owner typesÓ to be found. While men predominated there were plenty of women and
families including young children. Everyone had the opportunity to see and
handle everything from binoculars to handguns to trapshooting products and
while there was lots of camo gear available for purchase few people were
actually wearing such clothing in the exhibit hall.
When I first learned that the annual NRA meeting would
be held in Milwaukee I thought this was a reporting opportunity I just couldn't
pass up. I fully expected to have difficulty obtaining press credentials to
attend the event, but I was mistaken. The NRA staff was friendly, courteous and
helpful and the event extremely well organized. As two people who currently do
not own guns Norm and I were clearly in the minority in this crowd but neither
of us ever felt awkward or uncomfortable.
I grew up around guns and have family members who are
active gun owners and sportsmen and I have enjoyed the occasional opportunity
to hunt or shoot with my father. Like most people I am not opposed to guns but
merely haven't had sufficient interest to motivate my personal ownership of
one. I do find guns interesting and enjoyed the opportunity to see and handle
so many items that I simply don't otherwise come into regular contact. It is
easy to see how so many men and women do become enamored with guns. It is just
as evident that guns are an expensive hobby beyond the means of many lower- or
working-class citizens. A single name brand pistol can easily cost over $500
and many rifle and shotguns approach or exceed $1,000. And ammunition is
expensive as well. A box of 50 rounds of handgun ammunition runs anywhere from
$10-20.
While the exhibits are the clear draw for most attendees
the real goal of the NRA is clearly more political than retail. It is
impossible to walk two feet without being bombarded by the NRA message that
Americans' freedom to own guns is continually in peril. The group may have been
formed to foster marksmanship but it continues to exist primarily to promote
unfettered access and use of guns in America. NRA executive vice president
Wayne LaPierre may have opened the meeting by requesting that everyone present
honor and pay tribute to America's law enforcement and armed forces but his
real message is that NRA members must continually fight for maintenance of
their Second Amendment rights. ÒIf it weren't for the NRA there would be no
Second Amendment!Ó
The NRA covets the single-issue voter and encourages
the broadest possible interpretation of the Second Amendment. The right to keep
and bear arms is an absolute right and any form of gun control or legislation
is seen as an infringement upon that right by the NRA. No one was more strident
in making this point than rock star and NRA board member Ted Nugent but I
suspect the NRA has been quite successful in drilling this position into most
of those attending the meeting. The NRA would love to see all states emulate
Vermont and Alaska where anyone can carry a gun (concealed or otherwise) no
permit necessary. They favor absolutely no restrictions on the type and number
of weapons an individual can purchase and own and they disdain waiting periods
of any length and gun or gun-owner registration of any kind.
Over the last two decades the NRA has been remarkably
effective politically. Illinois, Kansas and Wisconsin are the only states that
still prohibit concealed carry of handguns but Kansans gain that right next
January. Thirty-six states are now
Òshall issue,Ó three others are Òmay permitÓ and eight others feature
limited special permission to carry including California and New York. The NRA
presents this as a law and order issue demanding that states permit their law
abiding citizens to defend themselves from criminals despite a national crime
rate at a 30-year low (even in Illinois and Wisconsin).
For years groups like the NRA pointed to law abiding
citizens hunting and target shooting as justification for gun ownership but
that has now changed. Many of the guns sold today have little or no value as
hunting or sport shooting weapons. Most of the handguns and many of the
military-style rifles that are the rage are designed for military or police
use-- not hunting or target shooting. But there is no disputing that firing
such weapons on the range can be lots of fun and most handgun owners purchase
them for self-defense not hunting or target shooting.
No one is going deer hunting with an AK-47 but neither
is the NRA apologizing for their members desire to own such weapons. An
important point the NRA fails to make is that the original rationale for the
Second Amendment wasn't hunting or self-defense from criminals or even a desire
to defend America from its external enemies. The real reason the Second
Amendment exists is to empower the average citizen to defend against the
potential tyranny of their own government. I find it ironic that for most of my
life I never took this concern seriously, that is until recent years. Who
knows, someday soon an NRA banner may feature my likeness.