Illegal
is a Pretext: Give them Amnesty
By Richard W.
Crockett
How
do we solve the problem of illegal immigration? How do we fix the problem of 12-20 million illegal
immigrants in this country? It is
a problem, a real problem in this sense.
We do not know who these people are. Security is an issue, and we need to get a handle on
it. But I submit that the debate
is not about security. The debate
is about Òillegal.Ó The critics of
immigration reform have made much of the fact, and it is a fact, of the illegal status
of many immigrants in this country, especially Mexican and other Latin American
immigrants. Of course the
designation, Òillegal,Ó denotes a crime.
How do we solve the problem of 12,000,000 or more so-called criminals in
our midst? The answer is simple:
declare them legal. Give them amnesty! Since I am not running for office, I can say that.
And with that stroke, CNNÕs Lou DobbesÕ anxiety level should go down for we
would eliminate 12,000,000 illegls!
Opponents
of immigration have chosen the word amnesty, and they have tried to make it a
dirty word by implying that criminals are being allowed to get away with
something. The Random House
Collegiate Dictionary defines amnesty as Òa general pardon for offenses against
the government,Ó and Òan act of forgiveness for past offenses.Ó I also checked the Bible for the word,
amnesty, used in the negative sense described above and could not find it. I also checked the Bible for
Òforgiveness,Ó and would you believe, it is there. If we assume that a ÒsinÓ is worse than a Òcrime,Ó for the
former is an offense against God, and the latter is only an offense against the
state, and we find that the Bible speaks of forgiveness of sins against God,
then is it not reasonable to consider forgiveness of offenses against the
state?
Of
course all crimes are not treated alike.
They are in a perfect world treated differently according to their
relative severity. Murder is
treated more harshly than shoplifting.
Even taking a life may be treated differently. Premeditated murder is prosecuted, whereas killing a person
in an act of self-defense may not be.
In a sense taking a life in an act of self-defense may be forgiven, even
by the state.
So
does the act of coming across a border illegally resemble more closely
premeditated murder or shoplifting? The act of coming across a border does not
look like premeditated murder, but it does look a little like stealing, in the
sense of, Òto move, go, or come secretly, quietly or unobserved.Ó (Random
House) ÒTo stealÓ is close to the
word, Òstealth,Ó in that it is a Òfurtive departure or entrance.Ó It sounds a lot like what the Mexicans
are doing. It could be regarded as
a surreptitious offense against the United States. So for me, the question is, ÒDoes it injure meÓ?
Now
in general it is not a hostile act, but an act of admiration and
recognition. The Mexicans want to
come here to be a part of our society.
They want to do this because they admire this country and what it offers
in human freedom, dignity and opportunity. They recognize the possibilities of enhancing their personal
lives in coming here. So if people
who like and admire us want to join us, why do we object, especially in the
case of the Mexicans?
Well,
maybe it is because we think of it as ours, and not theirs. But that contention is problematic
also. When one considers that the
Mexicans are by and large a native population to North America, their claim to this
place if it is not better, is at least prior to ours. The Aztecs, Navahos, Pueblos, Myans and other native
Americans who lived here prior to the European ÒdiscoveryÓ of America are the
ancestors of the Mexicans. My
ancestors came here June 25, 1631, which is pretty early, by American standards,
but theirs were here long before that. So how can we be the arbiter of the use
of this continent? I canÕt. We may
think that it is because we created the nation-state, here, and ordered it by
law. We imposed boundaries by law
where there were none before. And
when the nation-state was imposed in North American, it was imposed upon the
native population by, you got it, immigrants. ÒWeÓ were the immigrants. When modern nation states were established in North America
much of the American West was part of Mexico. We took (stole) it during the Mexican War and made it
Òours.Ó While I am not sure that
the Mexicans want it back, in some sense, maybe they do. We donÕt have to give it back, but we
can give them amnesty.
5/24/07