EverythingÕs changing in
bankruptcy world
by Mike Kroll
ÒDespite
the stated intentions of lawmakers, many of the changes in this new bankruptcy
law will make lives just that much more miserable for people already in
desperate financial straights and make the prospect of a fresh financial start
far less likely. Our founding fathers knew that the economic viability of our
fledgling capitalist nation depended, in part, on a more enlightened approach
to accumulated debt than BritainÕs debtorÕs prisons. That is why they
specifically included bankruptcy in the establishment clause of the
Constitution that sets out the powers of Congress. This new law may pay off for
the credit card companies but I am convinced that it will backfire on everyone
else.Ó Galesburg attorney Barry Barash, nationally reknowned specialist in
personal and business bankruptcy law.
While
bankruptcy law can trace its lineage to the Constitution itself and is,
therefore, a matter of federal jurisdiction, Barash says that state statutes,
particularly those relating to exemptions, have a huge practical impart on
individual debtors and vary widely from state to state. The Federal Bankruptcy
Code currently in effect was last updated in 1978 when it completely replaced
an act that dated back to 1898. In less than a month, all this changes yet
again. President George W. Bush signed the new bankruptcy law on April 20th and
most of its provisions go into effect 180 days later — on October 17th.
Bankruptcies filed after that date will be very different and experts such as
Barash are confident that there will be an almost immediate and precipitous
decline in the number filed— at least initially.
ÒMost
attorneys who handle bankruptcies have been very busy with cases where people
want to beat the deadline but few of us want to be among the first to test the
legal waters after October 16th,Ó noted Barash. ÒFor those of my clients who
can afford to wait, I plan to delay many filings until after January 1st. By
then we will not only have a better feel for how the new laws will work in practice
but also Illinois residents will benefit from a relaxing of the existing
miserly exemptions. Most Illinois exemptions double beginning next year and
that can make a real difference for many clients.Ó
Exemptions
are an important part of bankruptcy law and one that differs greatly from state
to state. Some states, like Florida and Texas, offer comparatively generous
exemptions. One of the key reasons for bankruptcy law is to insure a modicum of
common sense and reason in the management of debt that exceeds an individualÕs
ability to repay. Exemptions are theoretically designed to shield certain types
of personal property from seizure and liquidation so that the debtor and family
may be able to continue a somewhat normal life as their economic life is capsized.
In
most cases the exemptions permit a bankrupt individual to maintain a residence,
own a modest vehicle and maintain savings earmarked for retirement or
education. Bankruptcy cases are always filed in United States Bankruptcy Courts
located in every state but how the courts discharge cases is very dependent
upon the local state rules regarding exemptions and the validity of claims by
creditors.
The
most common form of personal bankruptcy has historically been Chapter 7 —
a liquidation of non-exempt assets with a managed disbursement to creditors and
elimination of most outstanding debt. Under Chapter 7 bankruptcy, many
unsecured creditors get little or nothing in exchange for forgiving accumulated
debt. This impacted credit card companies in a big way and they played a huge
role in shaping the new bankruptcy law. Most state and federal taxes, as well
as student loans and child support, constitute debts that cannot be discharged
or forgiven. Proponents of the new bankruptcy law, including members of Congress
and credit card companies, argue that too many Chapter 7 personal bankruptcies
have abused the system. In 2004 more than 1.1 million individuals filed under
Chapter 7 accounting for better than seven-out-of-ten personal bankruptcies
filed last year. One key goal of the new law, that most experts agree has been
accomplished, will be to significantly reduce the use of Chapter 7 personal
bankruptcies.
While
Chapter 7 rules can be applied to both individuals and businesses, the
alternatives are more specific to the type of entity. Unlike Chapter 7, the
remaining forms of bankruptcy are collectively termed as debt reorganization.
In these cases, fewer debts are forgiven outright and a Bankruptcy court
trustee determines a workable repayment schedule for a greater proportion of
the remainder. Lawyers refer to this as a supervised rehabilitation of the
debtor according to a court approved plan. Proponents of the new bankruptcy law
see Chapter 7 as too easy a way out for irresponsible debtors; one that
actually can encourage financial irresponsibility.
Under
the new law, a much greater proportion of debtors who elect to file for
bankruptcy will be required to do so under the reorganization chapters. Chapter
11 pertains to businesses and Chapter 12 to Òfamily farmers.Ó Chapter 12 was
set to expire at the end of 2004 but the prospect for its continuation and
permanent status is said to have influenced many Senators and Congressmen from
agricultural states to support the new law.
In
the case of personal bankruptcy, the alternative is Chapter 13 which replaces
the immediate relief from oppressive debt with a five-year court supervised
plan of debt repayment. Under Chapter 13 a determination is made of the amount
of reasonable and necessary expenses that are subtracted from the individualÕs
household income to determine the amount of disposable income. A schedule of
payments must be designed by the debtor and his attorney, approved by the
Bankruptcy Court that devotes every penny of disposable income toward repayment
of debt and assures a Òmeaningful paybackÓ to unsecured creditors such as
credit card companies. This is a much longer, painful and drawn-out process
that many experts believe actually reduces the likelihood of financial
rehabilitation for many forced into bankruptcy by traumatic life events such as
illness, divorce or unemployment.
ÒIn
my experience, many individuals are forced into bankruptcy by circumstances
beyond their control,Ó explained Barash. ÒWhen the credit card companies and
their allies in Congress passed this new law they cast a very wide net that
will ensnare many beyond the financially irresponsible at whom the changes are
supposed to be aimed. The economic circumstances we find ourselves in today
mean that more of us are at risk of suddenly losing our jobs or facing medical
bills beyond the limits of our health coverage or the very real financial
crisis of a divorce. A significant number of existing bankruptcy filings are
due to bad investments, even among well educated or those presumed to be
financially sophisticated. These are exactly the kinds of people who
historically made use of Chapter 7 bankruptcy to get back on their financial
feet. With the new tests now in place, many will now be forced into Chapter 13
instead.Ó
The
new law establishes a series of critical pre-filing requirements that were
aimed at preventing people with the capacity to repay many of their debts from
using Chapter 7 to escape responsibility for them. The process now begins with
what Barash refers to as the Òticket in,Ó a new requirement that an individual
must complete a financial counseling course offered by a court-recognized
non-profit credit counseling service. Such counseling starts at a cost of about
$80 and, in many cases, such services are geographically removed from debtors
in small towns or rural areas. The debtor is also obligated to provide a wide
variety of financial records and a complete credit bureau report prior to
filing. Barash warns that there is also a Òticket outÓ that must be punched to
gain final court approval of the reorganization plan; a second and separate
approved financial management course must be completed to receive a discharge.
Realistically,
Barash cautions that a bankruptcy lawyer is likely to require upfront payment
for these items in addition to his normal fees adding upwards of $400 to the
upfront costs incurred by anyone interested in filing for bankruptcy.
A
debtor also needs to pass a means qualification test to determine eligibility
for Chapter 7 versus Chapter 13. If demonstrable monthly income is less than
the court-specified median income in your state you can file Chapter 7.
Otherwise you must complete a disposable income calculation to determine if
your five-year total of disposable income would exceed $6,000 and equal 25
percent or more of your unsecured debt or simply exceed $10,000. In practice,
what this means is if you are determined to have $167 or more in monthly
disposable income, Chapter 7 is no longer an option. As Barash points out,
except for the very poor, this is a bar set so low as to preclude almost
working- or middle-class individuals from the Chapter 7 option.
If
you are already confused, let me assure you that we havenÕt begun to scratch
the surface of this new law. Barash is convinced that the complexity is only
partly due to the many changes and intricacies of the new statute. ÒA key
factor absolutely no one yet has a handle on is how the courts themselves will
shake this out. While the Constitution itself mandates uniformity in the
application of Federal Bankruptcy law, it is already established law that what
this really means is geographic
uniformity — not a single national legal standard or even a state
standard. In some cases, geographic uniformity will be determined at the county
level! There is sure to be confusion and differing interpretations across the
various Bankruptcy Courts themselves as well as attorneys and most certainly
the clients. There are many hidden facets in this new law that people just donÕt
know about, including many attorneys. That is why many are getting out of this
area of law. Bankruptcy is now no longer a game for dilettante, amateur or
other non-specialist. During the initial three to six months following October
16th, you will see attorneys take on bankruptcy cases and fumble through them
to the disservice of both their clients and the system. Meanwhile I expect a
huge influx of people getting bankruptcy cases filed just under the wire.Ó
Barash
is convinced that the new law will have a broad range of negative unanticipated
consequences. ÒRight off the bat, this law is bad for our economy. We are now
penalizing those with capital from taking risks with their investments. That
isnÕt good for the national economy but it is even worse for areas like our
that are struggling. The founding fathers had a more sophisticated
understanding of how this countryÕs economy would work than the elected
officials who passed this law.Ó
ÒBankruptcy
is the relief valve of the free enterprise system. Under this new law, I expect
to see a rise in the cash and underground economy. We will also see a huge
increase in people who are non-compliant debtors.Ó
While
experts like Barash can discuss and debate the intricacies of the new law,
there are important lessons for the rest of us. First, Barash pointed out that
the bankruptcy bar was already a small area of specialty and one he expects to
get much smaller. That means that we — as potential clients — will
have a harder time locating qualified attorneys to handle bankruptcies. In
Galesburg, there are two attorneys who handle the bulk of the cases and have
demonstrated expertise in bankruptcy law: Barash and Pam Wilcox of Stoerzbach
Morrison, PC. Second, not everyone would benefit from rushing to file under the
current bankruptcy law. This is actually a complex calculation that can only be
determined in consultation with your attorney or accountant and after all
personal financial records are reviewed and organized.
Barash
suggests some preliminary steps before contacting attorneys. ÒGather your
financial paperwork together and begin the process of documenting your
financial life. List all the debts owed as well as all the assets, making a
point of accurately noting their equity value. Conduct a realistic appraisal of
your personal and family strengths. What kinds of resources can you and your
family bring to bear on the situation? Develop a realistic budget of monthly
income and expenses and assess the stability of both. And finally, examine the
stability of your family and marriage and consider the implications on your
financial future. Any good bankruptcy attorney is going to ask you to conduct
this self-examination before you begin the process.Ó
ÒIÕm
telling people who call my office now that if they are serious about filing
right now, I will take time to meet with them but if they are just now
beginning to explore their options it is probably too late to beat the
deadline.Ó