Too
much bounty for the bins:
ThereÕs
a downside to record harvest
by
Mike Kroll
Ask any 10 agricultural ÒexpertsÓ to speak on any aspect of the
agriculture market and you are likely to get 5 to 10 different and carefully
qualified opinions. The agriculture industry is just that volatile and seems to
defy simple predictions. But this year there is little or no disagreement that
we are in the midst of a record corn harvest. The most recent USDA estimates of
the 2007 corn crop put it upwards of 13 billion bushels. When you couple this
huge harvest with the increasing importance of ethanol and the resultant
storage requirements to insure year-around availability and the significant
difference between the current market price for corn and the much higher price
a farmer can obtain for future corn delivery, you confront a very real issue of
storage capacity for this harvest.
Will farmers in western Illinois face a shortage of space at area
grain elevators? Are some farmers actually leaving corn temporarily unharvested
and standing in their fields because they have no place to store it?
According to a market research report from Advanced Trading of
Bloomington released Wednesday morning, the huge 2007 corn crop now means that
Illinois faces a shortage of 590 million bushels of corn storage space as
compared to the previous estimate of 385 million bushels. The shortage of
storage space is even worse in Iowa where that stateÕs corn harvest is now
estimated to exceed available storage space by 607 million bushels. Nationwide,
the USDA estimated that including corn remaining in storage from the 2006
harvest on September 1st there was nearly 20 billion bushels of corn in storage
nationally with weeks of the 2007 corn harvest yet to be completed.
Nevertheless Darrel Good, an agricultural economist with the
University of Illinois Extension Service, wrote in late August, ÒOn the
surface, it appears that issues of storage capacity will not be any more severe
than in 2005 (which was greatly impacted by Hurricane Katrina interrupting the
flow of grain out through the Gulf of Mexico). ÉRegional storage issues could
be more severe than implied by [this yearÕs production and storage estimates].Ó
Iowa State University agricultural economist William Edwards noted
recently that recent changes in the ratio of the market and future price of
corn to that of soybeans have led to
additional acres devoted to corn production in 2007. That combined with
record bushels per acre in this harvest is placing a significant strain on
available corn storage in Iowa. Edwards says that only about one-third of
IowaÕs corn crops are marketed immediately at harvest (September-November) with
two-thirds or more being stored and held back to take advantage of higher
spring and summer future prices.
Locally in western Illinois, farmers are enjoying the record corn
crop despite mostly minor losses caused by the severe wind that flattened some
corn crops in August. Brothers Randy and Martin Anderson are partners owning
Grain Store Elevators in Galesburg, Alexis, Alpha, Abingdon, Henderson, New
Windsor, Ophiem, Viola and Wataga with a total storage capacity of 14 million
bushels company-wide. They agree that storage capacity for the 2007 corn crop
is an issue statewide but not really much of an issue locally. ÒWe are seeing a
record local corn crop in western Illinois this year,Ó said Randy, Òand current
estimates are that statewide Illinois will be short storage space for 700
million bushels of corn but in this area nearly all producers should be able to
find available storage within a 20-mile driving radius of their farm.Ó
ÒMost of the real shortage of storage space is in southern central
Illinois or farther south in the state,Ó added Martin. ÒThere is no question
that storage capacity is an issue in other areas and we have been contacted by
farmers and grain elevators outside of this area about available storage space.
We expect to be able to handle the storage needs of our regular customers and
even new customers but by harvest-end it is likely that our storage capacity
will be full.Ó
ÒThe ethanol industry is probably the strongest factor impacting
the corn market in 50 years,Ó said Randy. ÒThe huge and growing demand for corn
generated by the ethanol industry has pushed prices up even as we experience
record harvests. But the best prices are often found in futures six to nine
months from now. Local producers are perhaps more fortunate than in other areas
of Illinois because during the 1970s and 80s people like us and the Twomeys
greatly expanded storage capacity in western Illinois. They [the Twomey
Company] probably have more than twice our storage capacity and there are a
good number of other elevators in the area as well.Ó
Martin confirmed that while the late summer storm did cause some
corn crop damage, most of the area farmers have been able to harvest their corn
crop with little field loss, maybe four or five bushels less per affected acre
than in non-affected planted acres. He also notes that agricultural economics
are a mysterious art that defies rational explanation but some factors
affecting corn pricing are becoming clear. Certainly the demand for corn by
ethanol producers has been an upward force in corn prices but Anderson says you
also need to look at the current state of the dollar and foreign corn crops.
ÒChina, the Ukraine and Australia are all experiencing weak corn harvests and
the currently weak American dollar makes our corn very attractive for export.Ó
The Andersons say they receive 95 percent
of all their incoming grain during the eight-week fall harvest season and much
of that corn will sit in their storage facilities for months. ÒWith todays
market price for corn at just about $3 per bushel and next March and April
futures selling for about $3.60 per bushel, many farmers will figure to pay the
extra storage fee and still reap additional profit by holding corn off the
current market. Our company is engaged in a market balancing act in which there
is no shortage of surprises and unforeseen events, storage capacity is just one
of those factors. We are constantly evaluating our investment in both storage
capacity and the efficiency of our loading and unloading capabilities and it is
likely we will be expanding and/or modernizing both in the near future.Ó
10/4/07