If I understand ObamaÕs position on
taxes, he has said that he would reverse Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, but he
would protect tax cuts for the poor and middle class families. The wealthy for purposes of this discussion are persons
making more than $250,000 per year.
He would reduce taxes on 95% of all persons earning under $250,000 per
year by $1,000. These claims
are diametrically opposed to what John McCain is saying that Obama would
do. In an ad running prominently
on national television, John McCain tells us that Barak Obama will raise our
taxes. ÒThis ad is a lie,Ó says
the Obama campaign.
David Wise, Washington journalist
wrote in 1973, ÒIf information is power, the ability to distort and control
information will be used, more often than not, to preserve and perpetuate that
power.Ó (The Politics of Lying:
Government Deception, Secrecy and Power: New York, 1973) Today it is clear that Wise was right
then, and that he might have added that lying would be used also to gain
power. With enough money a
candidate for the presidency can buy television time and run commercials in
which he can say anything he wants about his opponent. The distortions, half truths and
outright lies told through T.V. commercials in the name of free speech will go
unchallenged, for after all, Òtruth and error will grappleÓ and the truth is
supposed to win out. I am not sure
that it always does. Still, these
commercials also will do something else.
They reveal the character of the person doing the lying or allowing the
lies to be told in their behalf.
It is in this regard that Obama has a point when he charges that
McCainÕs candidacy promises to be a repeat of the Bush presidency. In his recent commercials, McCain has revealed
that the truth is not necessary to his public remarks. Its own engineer is
derailing the Òstraight talk expressÓ, and by his actions he is telegraphing
what a McCain presidency might be like.
After eight years of an
administration which perfected lying and secrecy as a way of political life,
and after the same administration having duped the American people into a war
of aggression, it is remarkable that any candidate would try to imitate the
practice and employ these tactics in order to win an election, and even more
remarkable that the American electorate would uncritically fall for the
deception. Yet we are witnessing such an effort in the present campaign. You may call it spin or you may call
it, distortion, half-truth, or lies.
In any case it involves the manipulation of the public through the
manipulation of fiction presented as fact. The moment that either candidate shifts in to negative
campaign mode and talks more about his opponent than his own positions, it is
time to go into the most suspicious and skeptical mindset.
08/28/08