Triumphant
trio: Three newcomers who will change the face of the Galesburg City Council
by
Mike Kroll
Three challengers soundly defeated incumbent Galesburg
City Council members in the recent election. Ken Goad and Mike Lummis, of Wards
1 and 7 respectively, prevailed by three-to-one while Russell Fleming received
received double the votes of his principal opponent in Ward 3. The new aldermen
ran on platforms of changing how the Galesburg City Council operates and feel
that they bring a strong voter mandate to this cause.
While on the one hand these are three very different
men from divergent backgrounds and experience they share many of the same
concerns about how the Galesburg City Council operates. Perhaps most
importantly, they seem very comfortable with themselves and one another and
eager to work together toward implementing changes. Although no one said as
much they appeared to genuinely like one another and were at ease in both
agreement and disagreement. While all three exude a quiet self-confidence none
seemed full of himself nor prone to the self-aggrandizement that has all too
often characterized some aldermen. All bring a strong sense of skepticism, an
unwillingness to accept tradition as a justification for city policy, and
impatience for change.
ÒThis
prevailing notion that pointing out flaws and looking for ways to fix things is
negative thinking has got to stop,Ó said Fleming. ÒWe can't afford to keep
doing things that don't work just because that's always been the way we do such
things in Galesburg,Ó added Lummis. All three see a more active role for the
city council than has generally been the case in Galesburg. ÒThe city council
has depended way too much on guidance from the city manager and staff rather
than discussing policy and priorities among themselves,Ó noted Goad. ÒThe
voters elected the city council to make policy and we hire city staff to
implement it. The staff should bring the necessary information to the city
council but it must be the council itself that determines what we do.Ó
The three feel a strong sense of accountability to the
citizens. While all view new city manager Dane Bragg as a major improvement
over Gary Goddard they reject the easy explanation of blaming Goddard for every
problem. The view seems to be that if a city manager runs amok it must be with
either the acquiescence or tacit approval of the city council. There is
uniformity of opinion that city government must be more open and transparent to
the citizens.
ÒToo many important issues are not fully and completely
discussed in open meetings,Ó noted Goad. ÒSome things really do need to remain
confidential but nowhere near as mush as is today. Just because it might be
embarrassing to discuss a problem publicly doesn't mean such discussion
shouldn't be done. The citizens have a right to know what the city is doing and
why and city council members shouldn't be made to feel that they must go along
with something they don't agree with just because it looks best to publicly
appear united.Ó
Lummis added, ÒThere seem to be far too many 7-0 votes
on significant issues where there has been little or no substantial public
discussion by the city council. I believe that with the three of us this will
happen less often. We also need to treat our constituents with greater respect when
they seek to address the city council. There should always be time and
opportunity for public input both before and during meetings. Better use of
first and second readings of agenda items would improve this as well.Ó
ÒAnd too many items are rushed through the agenda,Ó
commented Fleming. ÒI want to see a big decrease in the suspending of rules to
vote on items with only one reading. This isn't fair to the citizens who often
are blindsided by such maneuvers. Furthermore, the city council agenda should be
prepared and made public earlier than the Friday before a Monday night meeting.
I would like to see this agenda put on the city website at least a week prior
to a city council meeting. This gives aldermen and the public alike an
opportunity to ponder and discuss items before the meeting. Just because
someone is incapable of planning well enough ahead to have the material ready
soon enough doesn't mean we should rush the process. Rushing to vote on items
is a recipe for decision we will later regret.Ó
ÒAgendas need to be more balanced from meeting to
meeting,Ó said Goad. ÒNo more than two or three controversial or critical items
should be put on a single agenda so the city council can devote the time
necessary to discussing these items. And the various reports and proclamations
need to be limited on each agenda as well. In the last city council meeting
well over an hour had passed before the city council began work on the actual
agenda. We should also reorder agenda items so that related items are discussed
together rather than being sprinkled throughout the agenda. And when the city
is paying experts to speak on an agenda item we should move this item to the
front of the agenda and minimize the amount of time the citizens pay an
attorney or consultant to sit in the audience on the clock waiting for their
item to come up.Ó
They were unanimous in identifying the water system
and economic development as the city's top priorities. With respect to the
water system they are appalled that the city would fail to properly maintain
the water system to the extent that it is in such crisis today. While none
believe it will be popular all three feel that substantial increases to
Galesburg's water rates are unavoidable this summer.
ÒWe will be looking at increases well beyond the five
percent cap in place on the outside municipal contracts and it would be unfair
not to extend the same increase to ALL water customers,Ó said Fleming. Added
Lummis. ÒThe residents of Abingdon, East Galesburg and Knoxville have just as
much reason to want us to maintain and improve the water system as our own
citizens and they should accept a proportional burden of the cost.Ó
ÒWhy is it that during all these discussions of the
water system and its problems the city council has never been afforded the
opportunity to ask the water superintendent directly about the condition of the
system?Ó noted Goad. ÒWhen there are important issues before the city council
the city manager should make the most relevant city employee available to
answer city council questions-- not just his boss or his boss's boss who are
frequently less familiar with the issue.Ó
The three welcome creation of a new city director of
economic development but given the record of non-performance by the Galesburg
Regional Economic Development Association they question the value of continuing
to fund GREDA. ÒWith the turning over of responsibility of the Logistics Park
and hiring a dedicated city employee why should the city continue funding
GREDA?Ó ask all three. They also wonder just how much more money should be
spend to court the Chinese.
All three would like to see the city take the lead in
formation of an electricity buying group that could serve both business and
residential electric customers. And this needn't be limited just to Galesburg
noted Lummis who feels a regional group just might be an answer to skyrocketing
utility rates from AmerenIP. Lummis would also like to see more encouragement
to the construction of wind mills and other environmentally friendly forms of
local electricity generation perhaps in concert with School District 205 or
Carl Sandburg College.
For incoming first-time city council members these
three have clearly put more thought and commitment into some of their goals
than has been the case with even longtime Galesburg City Council members. All
eschewed any intent to grandstand as aldermen but they also promise not to be
cowed or cooped by defenders of the status quo. We have heard that before only
to be disappointed soon thereafter. Perhaps this time things will be different.
3 May 07