Thoughts
on the Virginia Tech massacre
By Alun
Thomas
After any mass shooting one of the most
predictable comments made during the aftermath is that the perpertrator showed
obvious signs of mental illness and a massive killing capacity that should have
been diverted before the spree occurred. Such missives are being spewed in the
wake of Virginia Tech killer Cho Seung Hui's deadly rampage which if you
believed those close to the situation could have been prevented if Hui's
supposed mental deficiencies had been attended to by those who had been alerted
to his fragile state of mind. Lies. If you tried to round up all the potential
sociopaths in society showing signs of rage, hate and revenge then almost half
the worlds population would have to be detained and contained in huge mental
facilities. You simply cannot tell when someone will go over the edge like Hui
did, whether the signs existed or not.
In 1996 I took a course at college
called Film Studies. It was a farcical class that the professor in charge tried
in vain to convince us that certain 'classic' films ('Death In Venice',
'Citizen Kane') had relevance to real life and society and were meant to be
taken seriously. As such I handed in essays based on the true classic films of
our age such as 'Death Wish 3' and 'Deadly Prey', films which featured huge
body counts and showed movies for what they were to me, jokeworthy. Another
third essay was voluntary. I did it and copied the lyrics from a Polish death
metal band named Dragon and handed it in. When I received the paper back the
professor had written 'you need to see me, I think we have some problems here'.
I never saw him and I was awarded an F for the paper. When I did run into the
aging English ponce some months later to question my grade he informed me that
he had thought I was a maniac and had warned the faculty about me as a
deterent.
Was I a budding psychopath? No. It was
simply my overwhelming disgust for the course that led me to produce such
disastrous essays with questionable content. But it was enough to raise
concerns about my state of mind. But could they have prevented me if I had
cracked and come to college armed with a switchblade and slashed at passers by?
No. In November of 1990 an avid gun collector and full time misfit named David
Gray went on a shooting spree that left thirteen dead in the sleepy coastal
town of Aramoana in New Zealand. It was unheard of for the country where gun
control was heavily regulated. After it happened I watched an interview with a
neighbour who described Gray as 'explosive' and a threat. Why didn't he warn
anyone then? After the event it was pure sensationalism. But who could have
predicted the loner's actions? Nobody. Explosive or not.
These types of shootings have been
taken place for an eternity so they should not come as a shock. But as they
become more common you cannot make even jokes about performing such an action.
A fellow I once worked with once said in anger after one too many evenings of
ridicule and humilation that he would come into work and pick us all off from a
warehouse across the street. I informed the bloated git that I could report him
to the police for such a blatant statement. Now we all knew he wouldn't do it,
but his anger when mocked sometimes put thoughts in my head and one night I
imagined a scenario where he chased me through the building firing
indiscriminately and how I would escape.
It seemed preposterous and I forgot
about it. Last week after Virginia Tech I was told that this man at his latest
job had been fired for telling his new workmates he would come in and shoot
them, in a certain order. It turned out he was accused after the killings of
being the most likely among the group to do the same thing there. This
infuriated him, hence the empty threat. It was enough for his fellow workers to
inform the supervisor, resulting in loss of job, a police warning and being
escorted off the property. I was amazed what I had heard years back actually
came back to haunt this guy. I was right after all. Would he do it? No. But if
he did you'd never know when and where. So what's the point of speculating?
We've all known an edgy loser in
our time. So because of the killings should we watch them closer? No. There's
too many disaffected cases out there to keep an eye on. And let's make it
clear. Virginia Tech wasn't a 'tragedy'. A tragedy to me is thirty two students
and teachers dying in a freak accident. Not a premeditated act of murder. How
is it a tragedy? Because Hui slipped through the cracks? That he was a
'victim'? Of what? I refuse to believe shooting an innocent victim in the face
is a tragedy. That word needs to be revised in its usage by all the pathetic
media outlets who covered the story into the ground until it seemed
meaningless.
Of course the same week as Virgina Tech
thirteen people were shot to death outside a police station in Nigeria, while
178 people were killed by acts of terrorism in Iraq. Do those deaths have
meaning to anyone except to serve as diminutive sidebars on CNN or the
internet? Do we ask if the killers in those situations were likely to commit an
act and could have been prevented? No, because it isn't here and in front of
us. It's sad, but it's a reality that exists and always will. Ask the families
of the thirty six people killed in Tasmania, Australia in 1996 by a deranged
gunman and the thousands of other victims around the world of such events. It
happens everywhere. And unless the cicumstances are extraordinary, we will
never know where and when it will happen again.
05/03/07